Sunday, 11/27/2022
12:00
16:05
Why is JSTOR so frustrating? Have to use it to write this acthitecture paper. Search: I want to search for important usages in research - i.e. "I want a research paper that focuses on Palenque and has an opinion" is basically my criteria now - a perspective piece. JSTOR search is naive and full-text; I will receive literally every essay that has "palenque" and "analysis" (or whatever descriptor I choose to use) as a result, and I have to weed through all of the results to figure out which ones have theses that make particular claims about Palenque.
At the least, if we're going to implement a naive full-text search, I should be able to view results in context - I want to see the 'most significant reference' to Palenque in the text and scan the surrounding paragraph, I want to view the thesis of the work, and I want to be able to assess the 'focus' of a particular article in order to weed out a search result when scanning by it. I want search to be better so that I have to do less work.
-
#push [[2022-11-27]]
- moa party -> twg (offer, already synced with [[bmann]])
- public document at doc.anagora.org/2022-11-27
- video call at meet.jit.si/2022-11-27